ACIM and the Four Yogas
"It is impossible to accept the holy instant without reservation unless, just for an instant, you are willing to see no past or future. You cannot prepare for it without placing it in the future. Release is given you the instant you desire it…You may be attempting to follow a very long road to the goal you have accepted. It is extremely difficult to reach Atonement by fighting against sin. Enormous effort is expended in the attempt to make holy what is hated and despised. Nor is a lifetime of contemplation and long periods of meditation aimed at detachment from the body necessary. All such attempts will ultimately succeed because of their purpose. Yet the means are tedious and very time consuming, for all of them look to the future for release from a state of present unworthiness and inadequacy...” (T-18.VII.4)
Recently I read The
Complete Book of Yoga by Swami Vivekananda. He brought Hindu teachings to
the western world in the late nineteenth century. I cannot recommend it as a
book of instruction, as it is dripping with guilt. However, it is informative.
What I took away from the
book was his categorization of the hundreds of Hindu paths, or yogas, into four
primary approaches. (Yoga means to join with reality.) Each of
these approaches aim for the same goal, and intersect and contain the others to
some degree, but his point was that each person takes a primary
approach, which would be one of these four.
Really, you can apply these
four primary approaches to anyone on a religious or spiritual path. None of
them is right or wrong in themselves, though they may be right or wrong for
you. Vivekananda emphasized that you should take the approach that
resonates with you and refrain from judging the approach that suits others. Different
does not mean wrong.
I have certainly seen these
four approaches among students of A Course in Miracles. In fact, it is
because of these different primary approaches that we each resonate with
different teachers.
The value of looking at these
approaches is it helps to “uncross the wires” and sort out contradictions you
encounter in your study. Each approach is consistent in itself but may not make
sense from another approach.
It also makes you aware that
there is no one right way to approach spirituality or religion, diminishing any
confusion or guilt you may have over your approach. For example, not long ago
someone said something to me about my “great love of Truth.” Uhhh….no. I never
have had a great love of Truth. Spiritually, I’ve never been a lover or
worshipper. I wanted to know Truth because It is the Truth. My approach
was more head than heart. Early in my teaching, I would have felt confusion if
someone said this to me. I would wonder if I was supposed to be worshiping
Truth. Now I understand better that it was simply not my way.
Of course, diminishing guilt
in your mind means diminishing projections of guilt onto others. When you are
comfortable with your primary approach, you will not be in conflict with others
over theirs.
The first approach Vivekananda
wrote about is called Karma Yoga. I would call this the path of perfecting.
He refers to this as the work one does, which he says is constantly
occurring. On the surface, one could almost think he’s pointing out, as the Course
does, that you are constantly teaching yourself and what you teach yourself
depends on which teacher you choose, ego or Spirit. But I would say that this approach
is represented in the quote above in the reference to “fighting against sin.”
This despite this approach recognizing that the material experience does not
touch your True Self! It is hard to reconcile the moralizing of this approach with
this recognition.
Oh, how harsh this way seems!
One is meant to come to hate the temporal world, to have no enjoyment (not even
of their path), and ultimately to have not even a single false thought. Of
course, this is so manifestly impossible it is expected to take lifetimes.
In the Course
community, the students close to the karma approach would be those folks who
are constantly at work at “right thinking.” Most Course students would
not say that they are aiming at perfection, yet there are those who are constantly
correcting themselves (and others through projection), which in the end is the
same thing, and has the same fearful motivation of guilt.
Of course, due to the guilt
in our minds, most of us start out this way, whether in the end it’s our
primary path. But for those who never move on from aiming for purity or
perfection, it is their primary path. Spirit will meet you where you
are, even if you insist on being harsh with yourself!
Then there is Bhakti Yoga.
This could be called the way of love (or worship). This is
the way most people want, as it is the most personal and feels more pleasant. However,
as I can attest from my own experience, you cannot force the approach that is
to be your way. Your primary approach arises naturally and the other approaches
often won’t make sense to you.
Vivekananda felt bhakti was
Jesus’s way. He also said it is the most natural way for humankind, but
I disagree, because obviously whatever way is one’s way is most natural to that
one.
The object of love in bhakti
is God, Truth, the Absolute—whatever you call Reality. It begins with a
personal god but can evolve into the Absolute’s Love for the Absolute at its
highest. The goal of this approach is no fear, no desire, and Love for the sake
of Love. I suspect this is the approach of most students of the Course.
Next is Raja Yoga, or
what I consider the mind-over-matter approach. Vivekananda says this
approach is found in the others more than the others are found in each other.
He considers it the science of the yogas. It is a path of meditation and
inquiry into the mind and in that regard, yes, I can see where the other
approaches use these practices. But ultimately, Raja is about controlling the
mind to control the body and manipulate matter.
The Course touches on
this in some of its discussions about the body and illness. Yet it only states
that one can use their mind to overcome matter and never goes into any detail
as to how one is to do this. This may be why it is the rarest approach taken by
students of the Course. I know of only one Course community that
takes this approach and I have never worked with anyone who was genuinely
interested in working at mind over matter, although I have referred a couple of
people to that community.
Finally, there is Jnana
Yoga. I would say this is the path of only God is Real. It is the
ultimate path of nonduality, or advaita which is probably the most well-known
approach in Hinduism in the Course community today.
In this approach, one is to contemplate
Reality and bring their mind back to It again and again. This is the approach
referred to in the quote at the top that many take as “…a lifetime of
contemplation and long periods of meditation aimed at detachment from the
body...”, which is not necessary. This very practice is what the Course
calls practicing the holy instant. Truth is here. There is no path.
If you are familiar with my 4
Habits for Inner Peace (here), then you know this is the approach I
discovered I was spontaneously taking, without knowing anything about jnana
yoga or advaita at the time. Clearly, it is my primary approach, the lens
through which I studied and teach the Course.
Vivekananda felt jnana was
the highest, yet most difficult approach, and the one least realized, because
it means denying appearances as reality. But it is probably the second most
common approach, behind bhakti, in the Course community.
Your primary approach is predetermined
by the role you are to play in the Atonement. As each approach contains the
others, all of them probably resonate with you to some degree. But you probably
feel right away which one is your primary approach. Knowing this may
help you understand why some teachers or teachings have not worked for you, and
may mitigate any confusion you feel over this.
>>>>>
If you have a question the answer to which you
feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and I will answer
it in this newsletter/blog.
Comments
thank you for this post. many years ago, before ACIM was published, i read Vivekananda's description of the four yogas and recognized my natural pull toward Bhakti, likely as a result of my encounters with the Love of Jesus as a child. when i became a student of ACIM later this is how i related to It's teachings. i have been aware of your approach as one of Jnana, and in the years I have been receiving your help, i've experienced the distinction as intriguing and easily made adjustments when it has been needed.
however, in recent years as my relationship with the HS has deepened, and i did not foresee this, the path has been naturally evolving toward a blend of Bhakti and Jnana, taking me ever deeper into the Well. your mentorship has provided invaluable groundwork.
i remain deeply grateful. n
In practicing presence this is what you are doing. You are practicing being present, in the Now. That's it. I allowed my mind to become unruly and now I need to reel it in. The way I do it is I sit in my chair with God or Jesus or the Holy Spirit in the room. I focus on being there with them. Every time my mind wanders I bring it back, over and over and over again. No prayer, no requests, no penance, no worrying about the past or future. I am just sitting there being focused on being there with Them. Mind training. It is my "little willingness."
MACIM-17.8.2