Enlightenment Ends the Journey

       In her book, The Real Christ, Bernadette Roberts details how Christ, or the awareness of truth, was lost in a cult of Jesus that arose in the early Christian Church. One of the ways this occurred was through a rigid insistence that only certain approved language could be used by writers and teachers, which meant much authentic experience was lost. If someone wrote about their genuine experience in language that was not approved by the Church, they were labeled a heretic and executed. She lamented this when she had begun having experiences that were not described in the contemplative or mystical teachings of her Church (The Experience of No-Self), leaving her without validation and support. Eventually, the Church’s power diminished and within and outside the Church there were many contemplatives and mystics who did write about their experience in their own authentic language, but she still could find only one or two teachers who wrote about what she was experiencing. She felt this was because either few were having these experiences or those that were did not write about them for one reason or another. Perhaps they could not find the words. Or perhaps, like she was to start, they were baffled by experiences they had not been led to expect from their studies.

After the shift in consciousness here that I call The Break when ego fell away and truth took up the center of this consciousness, this mind continued to try to understand and explain its experiences through the concepts of A Course in Miracles. It was often a struggle. For example, I could no longer find anything in this mind to which the idea of a “Son of God” could apply. But it was not until all the bloat and loftiness that ego brought to spiritual experiences fell away that the theological and ontological structures of the Course fell away, too. Well, duh. Of course. It was ego that insisted I try to fit my experiences into the Course’s structures because while pointing past ego, the Course doesn’t attempt to go past it.

 

“This course remains within the ego framework, where it is needed. It is not concerned with what is beyond all error because it is planned only to set the direction towards it.” (C-in.3)

 

The Course was solely ego’s journey. And as in the Buddhist “gateless gate”, the journey’s end (the gate) is the realization that that which went on a journey (ego) and the journey itself were illusions. So, of course the structures used for ego’s spiritual journey would no longer have meaning. It is clear now that the biggest obstacle to understanding what is really going on in consciousness, how it really works, was ego’s insistence on finding a “true self” or “true identity”, something the Course reinforces but is found to have been wholly for ego when ego falls away.

It is at this point that someone will ask me why the Course says what it says if it isn’t the whole truth. The Course is not the truth for all time for all. It is, in fact, the individualized curriculum of Bill Thetford. The ontology, theology, and psychology of the Course was shaped for Dr. Thetford and Helen Schucman, traces their relationship, and predicts what will happen for Dr. Thetford. You can see this even in the quote above. He did not go “beyond all error” until, just as predicted elsewhere in the Course, just before he died.

I am not suggesting that you dump the ontology and theology of the Course if it works for you. It did for Liz here up until the shift in consciousness because ego was the dominating thought system in conscious awareness here. What the Course teaches made sense then and brought comfort. It mitigated the pain of ego. But don’t cling tightly or be rigid about the Course, let your inner teacher lead the way. And understand that teachings that come from beyond ego consciousness come from a different world, which is why they may seem to contradict what the Course teaches. They are not “wrong” because they reveal the Course to be part of ego consciousness. Nor is the Course “wrong” because it occurs in and reinforces ego consciousness. It was meant for ego consciousness.

And if ego is to fall away for you, you will discover whatever path you took was only temporary. Be prepared for everything to fall with ego, including a spiritual journey and the structures that supported it. They do not occur outside of ego.

 >>>> 

If you have a question the answer to which you feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and indicate that you want it answered in this newsletter/blog.

 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Liz,
The Course is rigid to some degree. It has to be.
You left the Course teaching some time ago. You're free to teach whatever you want but you insist on advertising yourself as the ACIM Mentor. As someone who says they are enlightened this insistence on false advertising leaves us scratching our heads.
ACIM Mentor said…
A mentor is one who has gone before. Who better to help you avoid the pitfalls of ACIM than someone who has fallen into them and come out of them?
Miss Demeanor said…
There is no false advertising here. The mentorship is why we come, why we read. The authenticity of the mentor's sharing is affirmed by the Inner Teacher, while the Inner Teacher is needed. It is only the sense of a personal self that is scratching its head.
Anonymous said…
Miss Demeanor, I don't question the value or need. But for students trying to learn the Course as written I made a needed observation.
Miss Demeaner said…
The way to learn the Course is not as it is written, but as it is practiced: we cultivate a relationship with the Holy Spirit through forgiveness, Who then guides us based on our individual need at the time of our learning. This inner instruction will take us much deeper than the written material.
Anonymous said…
You are free to approach the Course as you wish. I'm just giving a heads up to those struggling with the Course.
will said…
ACIM was written for a specific purpose. When we try to make it fit other experiences we run into all kinds of difficulties. It was written to waken us (son of God mind) and to waken the Son Of God mind. It doesn't address all cosmic experiences. To try to drag it into areas it was not written for only causes massive confusion to those trying to be a part of Its plan.
ACIM Mentor said…
There is no trying to drag ACIM into something for which it was was not intended. It was written for a specific purpose - Bill Thetford's path. Yes, others can find it useful but to adhere to it as though it is specifically for you will lead to misusing it. No two people will have the same experience of the Course if they are following their inner teacher.
will said…
No where I am familiar with talks about humans having identical experiences. That is an interpretation you have thought up as is the course was for Bill only. It fits your narrative but only a cursory reading of the course shows this to be not true. But it is your paradigm and seems to work for the you. Please allow others to interpret the course as they are led.
will said…
Given what Jesus and the Holy Spirit (and God) say about bodies the narrative of the God Head getting together because two bodies are having trouble at work and dictate this enormous work for them alone makes no sense. THEY knew where this was going.
Anonymous said…
We would like to think that Bill and Helen were doing the course as it was dictated. That the course was a history of their participation and progress. But that is not the case. Despite Jesus continued efforts and encouragement neither of them were involved in practicing it. Despite this the dictation continued. To see the course as somehow being a history of their course involvement is a misunderstanding of its history.
Anonymous said…
Ken Wapnick said the entire course is being spoken to the Decision Maker in the mind.
ACIM Mentor said…
Bill Thetford began to do the lessons as they took them down. He eventually retired to spend his life practicing forgiveness as the Course teaches. He found the "mighty companions" mentioned in the MFT - all students of the Course - when he moved to California and spent the rest of his life among them. He saw the "real world" just before he died, just as predicted in the Course.
As a student and teacher, I made many mistakes with the Course I may not have made if I'd understood better the specifics that were meant for Helen and Bill. Having taught, coached, and mentored ACIM students since 2000, I have seen them make the same and other mistakes taking what was specific to Helen and/or Bill for themselves. I've watched them disregard their own inner teacher because what they heard did not line up with what is written in the Course. It would help to take a step back and read the Course as the specific journey for them. There is still a lot to benefit from it doing this while perhaps avoiding some of the pitfalls.
Anonymous said…
I tend to read the course as I understand the authors purpose for writing it.
Anonymous said…
The ego is very active in blocking the beauty and intent of the written course by picturing it as written by a human mind. I have given up trying to make people aware of what they miss. The woke culture is about keeping the egoic mind intact.
will said…
This is not a course about Bill and Helen. They are at most a side show. The ego pushes their importance to keep Jesus out of the course. A text written by Jesus relegated to unimportance. Bill as the Hero!
will said…
Jesus subtlety portrayed as a cult figure who ruined everything? Things have gotten so bizarre it is hard to wrap ones mind around it. We are witnessing an ego take over just like the course portrayed it.
will said…
If you are going to be a teacher of the Course you need to practice doing it. You but teach yourself every time you practice.
Joshua said…
Thanks be to all in this blog, I see reflected in the words what is in our hearts and am reminded that loving and calling for love is all that is really happening. I love you.

Popular posts from this blog

Committed to the Spiritual Process

Ask: Any insights on accepting not having the partner and family I want?

Ask: Does Lesson 68 have it wrong?