The Two Parts of Ego
One of the first words I understood A Course in Miracles to redefine, as it did with so many, was ego. It clearly referred to something more than just pride or self-centeredness or one part of the human psyche that, along with the id and superego, Sigmund Freud had defined. I understood ego in the Course to mean the whole personal experience. I discovered in time that most students understood this right away, too.
If you’ve had
more than insights but mystical experiences, then you are aware that
pure consciousness is more than just perceiving differently or perceiving
something different, it is a different experience of existence. While I
referred to ego as a thought system as its mind structures were
what I dealt with daily, I was aware that if it fell away, there would be a
shift in the experience of existence. However, I didn’t realize these two aspects
would not wholly fall away together.
The ego thought
system, which I have referred to as the psychological ego (the “conditioned
mind” in other traditions), is what we tend to think of as ego. It is a
system of beliefs and structures that uphold ego, the person, and the material
world as reality. This is the aspect of ego that you can “work on”. You can
question ego’s thoughts and beliefs and stories for the person. You can examine
its structures and determine their value to you. You can learn to watch ego’s
thoughts and let them come and go. This is how a teaching like the Course
mitigates the pain of ego. Basically, ego learns to deal with its most
difficult aspects to live a better life. If these practices are taken far
enough, they lead to what is called self-realization, an ego wholly
comfortable with itself and adjusted to its world. This is the spiritual goal
for many and results in what is sometimes called the authentic or true
self. Sometimes these practices open the way to clearer seeing if
glimpses of truth do occur, but they do not cause them.
But the ego
thought system arises in support of an ontological denial of truth that results
in a distinct experience of existence. This seems like reality until you have
the only other experience possible, pure consciousness, the truth of
consciousness. The experience of existence that is denial of truth is what I
have called the ontological ego and it is what you cannot affect
through any practice or process. It cannot be changed; it cannot be made to
fall away. It is either here or not. Until it is gone, pure consciousness can
only be glimpsed, not fully experienced. And the only cause of it falling away
is pure consciousness rising fully to conscious awareness. This is not
something you can cause, attain, or achieve. It is caused by the movement of
pure consciousness, not the actions of ego.
As this drew
near here, it felt like I was in another dimension. I often felt like a “ghost
in the world”—I wasn’t really in the world anymore, just seeing it and being
less affected by it as Liz continued to walk around in it. And then in a moment
(The Break), “I” was gone—that denial of truth, the heart, the core, the
foundation, the very premise of ego, had fallen away and the new dimension,
pure consciousness, was here.
In retrospect
I can see how the experiences of a new dimension signaled that ego was
dribbling away and The Break was the final drop. But in that moment, what felt
like “me”, that distinct experience of existence, of life, of reality, was
gone. It was no longer “I’m in a new dimension.” It was, “A new
dimension is here.” However, the ego thought system remained. I heard it
would “wind down” and in my case—not everyone’s—it has done so by its aspects as
well as its stories for and experiences of Liz rising fully to conscious
awareness before they fall away. Its power has greatly diminished in this
process, revealing it as an empty shell. Ego only seems to still be here
because its thought system still asserts itself, but its foundation, denial of
truth, is gone because truth (the “new dimension”) has risen to conscious
awareness.
And it seems
this is the way it goes for many who experience enlightenment—a distinct moment
when “I” fall away followed by a long process of the ego thought system
undoing. In fact, many practices that are taught by advanced teachers come out
of what arises spontaneously after the ontological ego has fallen away.
There is nothing left to do anything, and the ego thought system is seen
to be false, so watching its structures fall away is all that can occur. But,
perhaps not understanding this, some teach what now comes naturally to them as
though it is a cause rather than an effect. Those practices become what people
who have not had the foundation of ego fall away use to attain
self-realization or to try to make ego fall away.
So, ego’s “spiritual
journey”, whether it be “purifying” ego or ends in enlightenment, is caused by
truth rising to conscious awareness. This results in the spiritual study and
practice and process one feels moved to engage in. For the ego thought system,
this can lead to psychological and emotional shifts. The ones that spiritual
students seek through spiritual “work” are “awakenings” when pure consciousness
is glimpsed, as during near death or mystical experiences. Again, no practice
can cause these but may make the way for them to arise more clearly if they do
occur. And these glimpses of truth may lead to significant personal transformations,
but they still occur in ego consciousness. Ego validates itself through them, but
they do point to truth, pure consciousness beyond ego (what most call
“God”) no matter what ego does with them.
Ego turned
out to be far more of the experience here than it allowed into awareness.
Denying truth meant—no surprise—it denied the full extent of itself as well.
But ego also turned out to be less, because it made no distinction between
itself and pure consciousness. This is how it made itself seem real to itself.
In fact, ego only appears in pure consciousness and its denial of this does
not survive pure consciousness rising to conscious awareness, no matter its
thought system takes a while to wind down.
>>>>
If you have a question the answer to which you
feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and indicate
that you want it answered in this newsletter/blog.
Comments
⁴The ego is the symbol of separation, just as the Holy Spirit is the symbol of peace. (https://acim.org/acim/en/s/91#9:4 | T-5.III.9:4)
²The ego arose from the separation, and its continued existence depends on your continuing belief in the separation. (https://acim.org/acim/en/s/82#3:2 | T-4.III.3:2)
The ego and the spirit do not know each other. ²The separated mind cannot maintain the separation except by dissociating. ³Having done this, it denies all truly natural impulses, not because the ego is a separate thing, but because you want to believe that _you_ are. ⁴The ego is a device for maintaining this belief, but it is still only your decision to use the device that enables it to endure. (https://acim.org/acim/en/s/85#4:1-4 | T-4.VI.4:1-4)
However, where my experience deviates from ACIM is that the "you" that is the separated mind - and is who ACIM speaks to - falls away rather than discovers it is the "Son of God", as I pointed out in other recent articles.