Why "Consciousness"
Last week I wrote about
truth, or pure consciousness, rising to conscious awareness. I mentioned
how the Christian labels (God, Christ, Holy Spirit) used in A Course in
Miracles, though never used here (this conscious awareness) in the
traditional Christian way (Christ never meant Jesus, for example)
have fallen away as special words are found unnecessary for something so
delightfully ordinary and simply present. There has been a long journey here
with the word “consciousness”, accepted, rejected, and accepted again, this
time because it has been found to be distinctly apt.
The word consciousness
in the context of spiritual experience and aspiration seemed to have developed
in Eastern religious philosophy rather than in the West. While Liz here
recognized the truth of nonduality teachings, she was never moved to pursue
them. There was an attempt here sometimes to translate what was said about consciousness
in those teachings into the Christian symbols of God, Christ, and Holy Spirit,
but in the end, the Chrisitan symbols won out as the significance of consciousness
was not yet experienced and, frankly, was not special enough for ego. Another
obstacle was thinking of the word psychologically rather than factually. But as
it turns out, experience, rather than the intellect, reveals the word consciousness
to be the most suitable.
A while back, the
significance of conscious awareness began to niggle here. Liz here would
say, and hear others say, about spiritual insights or mystical experiences, “It
was here and then it left.” Where was the “here” that truth had risen to only
to leave? When The Enlightened Mind showed up here years ago—where was this
“here”? It was conscious awareness—one’s immediate awareness. It
is the space that holds appearances—what the body’s eyes see, thoughts,
feelings, and experiences. It isn’t enough to know that there is a truth beyond
appearances. What spiritual seekers want is for it to be in their immediate
awareness, or, at least, just out of awareness in the subconscious, with easy
access to it. Having truth in conscious awareness is what the spiritual journey
is about. After seeing this, it began to be understood here that ego was the
reason for consciousness seeming to be divided up into conscious awareness, the
subconscious, and the unconscious.
When this began to be seen
here, the loftier spiritual terms still prevailed. And then they fell away in a
wonderful deflation of ego’s spirituality. What was left was the awareness that
what is, is right here and always has been and it is ordinary, not distant, not
lofty, not special. It is plain, everyday consciousness. The Enlightened
Mind coming to conscious awareness to stay was merely the fullness of
consciousness rising to immediate awareness and never slipping further away than
the subconscious again.
Of course, consciousness
is just a word—a symbol. It is the word given to the space, or field, in which
appearances—the material world, thoughts, feelings, experiences—appear. Space
and field are just symbols, too, meant to convey an experience of
something limitless. It’s been called here by labels other than the Christian
ones, like hereness and everpresence. And some say the infinite,
the eternal, or the vastness. It is what is. But consciousness
is an apt symbol, far more than ever could’ve been imagined before it was
experienced, because it is what is here, directly in experience. It is easy to
understand the significance of conscious awareness, one’s immediate
awareness. Anyone would say “this is where I am, this is my reality”. And once
it is seen that ego, the interloper in consciousness, splits conscious
awareness off from the rest of consciousness, it can be understood that
conscious awareness is part of (one with) consciousness. And that is something
right here, ordinary and everyday, not some lofty, distant “God”.
Does this mean you should
dump Christian symbols? Not if they have meaning for you. The experience, not
the labels, is important. Nothing experienced here now is different from what
was seen when Christian symbols were used. What changed is the experience of
truth came and turned out to be ordinary, everyday consciousness that special
words imply is something else. Those special words are bloated with
connotations derived from fear.
I still use those symbols
with my clients if they prefer them. The experience I share is the same either
way. What is meant to be conveyed in this article is that any sense of distance
between your conscious awareness and truth is an illusion because your
conscious awareness is truth—consciousness. It does not matter if ego
blocks this awareness and turns the rest of consciousness beyond your conscious
awareness into something lofty and distant. This, too, is just something
appearing in consciousness and has no effect on it whatsoever. You are always
in truth, whether you see it or not.
>>>>
If you have a question the answer to which you
feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and indicate
that you want it answered in this newsletter/blog.
Comments