Ask: Could you please explain the difference between the ontological and psychological ego?
“Please explain the difference between ontological ego and psychological ego. I've reread your blogs and asked ChatGPT but I'm still confused.”—Anonymous
Your confusion is understandable. I
would not know this distinction if the ontological ego had not fallen away. So,
I’m not sure the difference can be conveyed.
The psychological ego, or the ego
thought system, is easier to discern because it is what blathers away in
your mind much of the time. The ego thought system is what you must deal with
to improve your living experience; it is what psychology and A Course in
Miracles address. It is all that you can address.
The ontological ego is harder to
describe because it is an experience of existence—a living experience. It is
not just thoughts and feelings, but the I/me experience. It may help you
understand if I say that Liz fell away here. The person who was here is simply
gone. Many who have the experience of the ontological ego falling away change
their names to something they feel is spiritually significant because they feel
this. I have not been moved to do so and simply see “Liz” as the body/personality
now. Certainly, the people around me think of this body and personality as Liz
and really have no clue that the one who used to be here is gone. This shows
what the Course says, we make an ego not just for ourselves but for
others, too. For this mind (this conscious awareness), the body/personality of
Liz is just a cypher, an empty shell—as is everyone else. This is not a
bad-feeling emptiness, just a fact. There’s no one home!
Nothing makes this clearer than Liz
interacting with her ex-wife. It does not feel here that she is “my” ex-wife,
but rather the widow of the one who fell away. It has been this way since the
moment of The Break and what followed, the sensation of dismantling someone
else’s life while everyone around me mistook the body/personality for her. It
does not feel here that certain feelings for others are gone, but rather that
the one who felt those feelings is gone, leaving only the memory that those
things were felt here once. The one who fell away has not been replaced by
someone else, either. Instead, there is just this space—this conscious
awareness—wholeness, and the remnants of ego’s world and thought system, which continue to fall away.
What this experience revealed is that
there is more here, right now, in everyone’s conscious awareness, than the “I”
experience, because nothing new showed up when ego fell away. The “I”
experience had taken central stage for a while, but it was never the only thing
here. Its centeredness blocked the awareness that there was more here than it
because everything in consciousness was thought to be one thing, the “I”. But
it turns out the “I” was only something appearing in consciousness, as are Liz
and the remnants of the ego thought system.
Don’t worry about understanding this. The
ontological ego is not discernable until it falls away or at least begins to. This
is not something you can make happen. What you can address is the ego
thought system, and you want to do so if you want to improve your living
experience. And that is what the Course is for.
>>>>
If you have a question the answer to which you
feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and indicate
that you want it answered in this newsletter/blog.
Comments