Ask: Accepting What Is and Accepting what is
This week’s article follows up on an earlier article about living
in the flow of the universe (http://acimmentor.blogspot.com/2015/03/in-flow-of-universe.html) as well as
last week’s “Ask ACIM Mentor” article (http://acimmentor.blogspot.com/2015/08/ask-any-insights-on-accepting-not.html).
When you accept What is – that only the Truth is true – it follows that you
also accept what is at the level of form without resistance or judging the
self’s role in the unfolding story of the universe of form. When you find your
wholeness in Truth you stop living through the self so you accept it as it is
and just watch it unfold.
The play/movie “Amadeus” always comes to my mind when I
think of an example of how miserable a life is when one does not accept it as
it is. The story is a fictionalization
of the relationship between the genius composer Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and the
composer Antonio Salieri. In the story Salieri as a young boy is so moved by
beautiful music in church that he makes a deal with his god: He will devote his
life and his chastity to his god if his god will give him the ability to make
beautiful music. Salieri indeed goes on to become a composer and is talented
enough to rise to be the composer to the Austrian emperor’s court.
Then one day Salieri hears the beautiful music of Mozart and
knows that only someone touched by his god could make such “forgiving” music.
He is eager to meet the man whom his god has blessed. But in the story Mozart
is depicted as vulgar, uncouth, and undisciplined. This man is blessed by god? Salieri is appalled and feels mocked and
abandoned by his god. He vows to take revenge on his god by destroying Mozart, whom
he sees as his god’s favorite. He does everything in his power to obstruct
Mozart and he terrorizes Mozart with visions of his late disapproving father.
When Mozart is dying (kidney failure) Salieri can’t resist taking an
opportunity to be touched by his genius and helps him finish his final
composition (Requiem). Mozart dies in poverty and is buried in a pauper’s
grave. Salieri’s obsession with Mozart lands him in an institution and he ends
his life lamenting his own “mediocrity”.
Salieri made a deal with a god that existed only in his own
mind. Even if there was such a god the deal was all one sided – Salieri alone
decided the terms of the deal. For this deal with an imaginary god he made
sacrifices no one asked him to make. When things didn’t turn out the way he
demanded he destroyed his own life as he tried to destroy another. He never saw
that it was his own arrogance and resistance to what is at the level of form that led to his sense of persecution.
Now imagine if instead Salieri knew What is - that only the Truth is true. He would have found
wholeness in Truth. So he would not have needed to seek through the self’s life
in the world for wholeness. He would’ve accepted the self’s talents and limitations,
without judging either. When Mozart came along he would’ve felt blessed to be
around to hear such music rather than feeling deprived because the music didn’t
come through him. Instead of judging Mozart he could’ve used his power to
assist Mozart in getting his music out to the world. Salieri would’ve
understood that his love of music was for playing out the role, not of a
composer genius himself, but of facilitating the genius of another (Mozart).
How much more harmonious and peaceful would Salieri’s mind have been if he had
accepted the self’s role rather than insisting that it play out the way that he
decided it should?
>>>>>
Learn about the books The ACIM Mentor Articles, The Plain Language A Course in Miracles, 4 Habits for Inner Peace, and Releasing Guilt for Inner Peace.
Comments
There's a lesson here! Thanks Liz.
Here is what you wrote:
"When you accept What is - that only the Truth is true - it follows that you also accept what is at the level of form without resistance or judging the self's role in the unfolding story of the universe of form. When you find your wholeness in Truth you stop living through the self so you accept it as it is and just watch it unfold."
On reading this, then the image that forms in my mind is that I am an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp. I am watching as they push the still alive persons into the ovens. To simply "be present and accept it as it is" seems then the greatest error possible. I think we are to correct error as much as possible, not just be an observer.
Any words of wisdom to correct my misunderstanding?
— Richard
Acceptance, by the way, is not the same as passivity of the self. This article was about what goes on in the mind. It was not about the actions of the self. The self may or may not act to stop something in the world. In either case the mind can just observe without judgment.
Sing it out folks! Bring me a Love High!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwuHtbcvTh8
Bring It!
I have disowned the truth. Now let me be as faithful in disowning falsity. Whatever suffers is not part of me. What grieves is not myself. What is in pain is but illusion in my mind. What dies was never living in reality, and did but mock the truth about myself. Now I disown self-concepts and deceits and lies about the holy Son of God. Now am I ready to accept him back as God created him, and as he is.
The course describes this ego fabricated maker, most eloquently in lesson 95,
You see yourself as a ridiculous parody on God's creation; weak, vicious, ugly and sinful, miserable and beset with pain. Such is your version of yourself; a self divided into many warring parts, separate from God, and tenuously held together by its erratic and capricious maker, to which you pray. It does not hear your prayers, for it is deaf. It does not see the oneness in you, for it is blind. It does not understand you are the Son of God, for it is senseless and understands nothing.
On pages 26-28 in 'The Message' it is talking about healing the mind not the body. Is body the same as personal mind?
No, "body" and "personal mind" are not the same. "Personal mind" in my translation is the same as "ego" in the original. It is a thought system in the mind about the body as reality.
Observing the personal mind is the way to detach from it. The fact that you can observe it shows you that it is not you.The observer cannot observe the Christ Mind because the Christ Mind is What it is. This is what it learns as it drops the ego.
Accepting correction of your perception that you are separate from God (the Atonement) takes many forms. Observing in itself is not the correction. The realization of where you are observing from is the correction.
I had thought the very first thing the course wants you to do is this observing. This is prior to awareness of the Holy Spirit. You observe asking the Holy Spirit to help you or be there as you observe. This is the first step in ACIM in moving towards awareness.