Ask: How do I accept someone without giving up on them?

          Recently, in a conversation with a friend who is on the path, she wondered how she could accept someone close to her who is clearly steeped in guilt and acting in ways from that guilt that is harmful to their relationships, without feeling she is giving up on any hope that this person will change and grow. During our discussion, she suggested I use this question for this article.

Specifically, she was concerned with how to go forward with this person with boundaries that protect herself when necessary but without leaving the relationship, which she feels would be abandoning the other. As she is a Spirit-centered person, she recognizes that she will at some point let go of outcomes and attachments, but also that for now she is still triggered by others’ pain. So, I suggested that she refrain from deciding about the relationship as a whole and instead take each encounter with this person as it comes, responding authentically in that moment, trusting whatever that is, and—this is the hard part—not judging it.

In fact, this suggestion is simply what comes naturally when you no longer have attachments and are not concerned with outcomes. You are simply with people in the moment and act as you are moved. And when you are done, you are done.

Often, spiritual students assume that if they are Spirit-centered, their words and actions will be gentle and their exchanges with others will be peaceful. But this is not the case, because when you are dealing with egos, both your own and others’, it can be loud and raucous and messy. Sometimes, the only way to break through barriers, your own and others’, is to get loud, to get in someone’s face, to say things in a way that gets their attention, and sometimes even your own. In other words, trust Spirit has you both and that what occurs is necessary, no matter how it looks.

 

>>>> 

If you have a question the answer to which you feel may be helpful to others, send it to Liz@acimmentor.com and indicate that you want it answered in this newsletter/blog.

Comments

will said…
Good advice for your friend.
When Jesus was working with Helen who was a real hard head, He didn't hold back when needed.
will said…
M-17 has good advice for teachers dealing with egos, theirs or others.
will said…
“The script is written”

The problem we have in understanding the courses explanation of the separation are many. One is that the egoic mind revolts (often without our knowledge) at the idea of a dream. When we try to understand the separation, the mind will always try squeezing it into a story line that fits our experience as humans not as our true Self. Immediately we begin to doubt the course.

Lesson 158 clarifies this problem. The revelation that the Father and the Son are One will come in time to every mind. Yet is that time determined by the mind itself, not taught. “The script is written’ when experience will come to end your doubting has been set.” When this revelation of reality will happen has already been set.

The final chapters of the text urge us to begin the transition from thinking of ourselves as bodies to that of mind.
will said…
There would seem to be real advantages that when the body dies and the transition begins we are already fully aware that we are spirit.
Unknown said…
"trust Spirit has you [both] and that what occurs is necessary, no matter how it looks",
a gift universal in application
will said…
Thank you unknown. It was just humor :-)
will said…
On page 584 (T-27.VII.11-14) the course explains the separation without us having to juggle time and eternity. It explains it by telling us what happened to the Son Of God to get him from heaven to what we experience today. For the first time, it tells of the two dreams that led to this.
will said…
In the fist dream we see the son as ego but still just an observer. He is looking at the dream he projected from his now split mind. Time has entered and he sees the dream from beginning to end. In the second dream, ("yet under this dream is yet another") he now enters the first dream as a participant.
With this explanation we can now view the atonement as it was meant to be understood. Without time and infinity.
will said…
With this explanation the course allows us to bring the atonement down to a manageable size that our minds can now use it as a daily tool in their healing.
will said…
My personal mind as ego likes to think of ‘enlightenment’ as a trophy or award given to it for its hard work. Of course it does. The course would have us see it as the means for the Holy Spirit to extend healing to the sons of God who perceive themselves as encased in bodies.
will said…
So who is the course referring to that is watching the dream from its ending?
It is the son of God now as ego in the first dream. Observer but not participant.
will said…
As we climb the ladder towards our identity as spirit the course will begin to talk to us of letting go of the body as our identity. It is preparation for what lies ahead. We cannot, of course, make this happen on our own but we can be willing to learn whatever the Holy Spirit is putting in front of us.
will said…
"Study" of lessons 157-160 will help with this.
will said…
I think the ego in its need for control had us misunderstand the courses words that the lessons are for beginners. A review at a casual pace and we will see their real value as words with great depth that meet us everyday just where we are on our journey.

Popular posts from this blog

Committed to the Spiritual Process

Ask: What is meant by "extend Love"?

Evolving Practice with ACIM