Ask: Can you explain this quote in ACIM about God creating distinct beings?
“I was doing my
morning reading of the Course when I
came upon this statement in Text-4.7.5:
'God Who encompasses all being, nevertheless created distinct beings who have
everything individually, but who want to share it to increase their joy.
Nothing that is real can be increased except by sharing it.' This confuses me a
bit...thinking we need to lose the individual…” – JW
Yes,
it is a confusing quote out of context and seems to contradict much that A Course in Miracles says about Oneness.
And it certainly contradicts the experience of Oneness! Oneness means one and
the same throughout. There is no distinction to be made in What is One. The
conversational nature of ACIM, especially in the first few chapters, also makes
it confusing because there is an implied understanding between the Voice and
Helen so there is a lack of helpful elaboration for the rest of us. But that
quote is understandable if you remember that in ACIM “to create” means “to
extend” rather than “to bring into being”. You can read the quote as: “God Who encompasses all being,
nevertheless extends Himself to seemingly-distinct beings who have
everything individually but who want to share it to increase their joy…”
In
my translation of ACIM into plain language (The
Message of A Course in Miracles) I translated it as:
“Even in your
perceived separated state you have not stopped being One with God’s Being, in
Which you have Everything, and in Which you increase God’s Being to increase
your Joy…”
>>>>
A mentor is someone who is walking
the path ahead of you and can teach you from their experience. If you are
interested in speaking with someone who has attained lasting peace email me at Liz@acimmentor.com
to set up a telephone appointment. Learn more at www.acimmentor.com.
If you have a question the answer to
which you think will help others, email it to me at Liz@acimmentor.com
and indicate that you want it answered in the newsletter/blog.
Comments
All through history, there have been such servers of humanity, called when needed and when they were "ready", or in Helen's case, who did this amazing service when she was not quite ready. So the need for such as she, must have been great indeed!
This passage SEEMS confusing only when read in isolation and apart from earlier comments in Chapter One, (much of which got left out of the published version), and so certain parts became further misinterpreted.
By year 2000, I had studied the Course for 22 years (since 1978). But when we got the UR-text (in 2000), it became a whole new ball game for me. I recommend looking at the earlier versions when possible. For my study, I made a 3-way comparison between the UR-text/HLC/and WV, which has given me a deeper look at the teachings.
Blessings to all, Lenore
Of course it also happens with my own writing, quite often. How it's read can be very different from what I meant. This is why I prefer teaching one on one. The back and forth of conversation leads to greater clarity for both of us. Of course, I've also had many times when people have correctly quoted back to me my words, but their understanding is way off from what I meant to convey! Again, it's what is going on in their mind that is the issue. And one on one conversation helps us clarify and go deeper.
I have read Course in Miracles, as well as many other teachings. And practised it.
The one breaks into multiplicity to be able to experience itself outside of itself.
When one shares joy... the others start experiencing the good vibe, which in turn makes them be pleasant among others who they come across later on